Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has expressed concern over a potential Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation connected to her participation in a public immigration-focused webinar earlier this year. The event, which aimed to educate attendees on their legal rights during immigration enforcement encounters, has since drawn scrutiny from critics.

The webinar, held in February, was conducted in both English and Spanish and featured legal experts offering information to immigrants on how to handle visits or interactions with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Attendees were informed of their constitutional protections, including the right to remain silent and the necessity for ICE agents to have a judge-signed warrant to enter a home.

Ocasio-Cortez, who helped organize the event, maintains that her role was to ensure the public had access to legal resources and accurate information. As part of the outreach, her office shared materials about pro bono legal assistance and how constituents could seek help during deportation proceedings through privacy release forms.

However, questions were raised when former Trump administration immigration official Tom Homan publicly called for an investigation into the event. Homan voiced concerns over whether distributing such information could hinder law enforcement efforts, and he stated that he had contacted senior DOJ officials to inquire further.

Despite these developments, Ocasio-Cortez says she has yet to receive a response from the Department of Justice. “I’ve asked them, they haven’t responded to me,” she told Fox News, emphasizing that she was acting within her First Amendment rights.

In a formal letter to the DOJ, she requested clarification, stating, “Over the past two weeks, public comments have been made suggesting possible legal action against me for providing constituents with information about their rights. I want to understand whether these comments reflect actual DOJ intent.”

Critics have questioned whether the calls for investigation stem from political motivations, while supporters argue that providing legal information is a protected form of public service.

The dispute underscores a broader debate over the role of elected officials in advocating for immigrant communities and how far those efforts can go without crossing legal boundaries.

As of now, there has been no confirmation that any formal investigation has been launched.